Andress v. Cook Incorporated et al
Gary Andress |
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and Cook Medical, LLC |
1:2022cv11138 |
May 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Denise Page Hood |
Patricia T Morris |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Cook Group Incorporated, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Medical, LLC* (LHos) |
Filing 2 Notice of Corrected Judicial Assignment due to Clerical Error: Reassigned from * District Judge Denise Page Hood* and *Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford* in Detroit to District Judge Denise Page Hood and Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris in Bay City (SSch) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gary Andress against Cook Group Incorporated, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Medical, LLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8922900 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Bay - County Where Action Arose: Bay - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): US District Court Southern District of Indiana, 1:14-ml-2570-RLY-TAB, Judge Richard L. Young] (Thompson, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.