Nguyen v. Floyd et al
| Duc Van Nguyen |
| Michelle Floyd, Mailroom Supervisor and Unknown Defendants |
| 1:2022cv11628 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of evidence of paid filing fee by Duc Van Nguyen (DPer)
|
|
Filing 5
JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
Filing 4
OPINION and ORDER Vacating #3 Order to Correct Filing Deficiency and Summarily Dismissing Case. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Opinion & Order, and #5 Judgment to Duc Van Nguyen #653384, COOPER STREET CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 3100 COOPER STREET, JACKSON, MI 49201. (KWin)
|
|
Filing 3
[VACATED PER #4 ORDER] ORDER to Correct Deficiency for failure to submit filing fee. Correction due by 8/18/2022 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (SKra) Modified on 8/2/2022 (KWin).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Mediation Program (SKra)
|
|
FILING FEE Received in the amount of $402.00 by Duc Van Nguyen - Receipt No. 150000905 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (LHos)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Duc Van Nguyen against Michelle Floyd, Mailroom Supervisor, Unknown Defendants (SKra)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
