Martin v. Hunt et al
| Eric Martin |
| Gene Hunt and Sheriff Hinkley |
| 1:2022cv12008 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Eric Martin re #3 Memorandum Opinion & Order, #4 Judgment (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 5
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Eric Martin re #2 Regarding Parties Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
Filing 3
OPINION and ORDER Denying With Prejudice #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Denying Certificate of Appealability, and Denying Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #3 Opinion & Order, and #4 Judgment to Eric Martin, Calhoun County Jail, 185 East Michigan Avenue, Battle Creek, MI 49014-4066. (KWin)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eric Martin against Sheriff Hinkley, Gene Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (SKra)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
