Lori Lippard LLC et al v. Povinelli
| Lori Lippard LLC and Lori Lippard |
| Amy Povinelli and Amy Povinelli Doing business as BlingthingzbyAmy |
| 1:2022cv12600 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Lori Lippard LLC (Bathke, John) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Amy Povinelli* (KBro) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lori Lippard LLC, Lori Lippard against Amy Povinelli with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Fee Required - Fee Not Paid. County of 1st Plaintiff: Midland - County Where Action Arose: Saginaw - County of 1st Defendant: Saginaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Bathke, John) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (KBro) |
| FILING FEE Received in the amount of $402 by Lori Lippard LLC - Receipt No. AMIED-9110286 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (SSch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
