Darling v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
| Melodi Darling |
| The Dow Chemical Company and Kelly Services, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv13093 |
| December 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER to Submit Material for Case Management Order. (Short Statements Submitted to CM/ECF, Utilities, Proposed Orders due by 3/8/2023. ) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
Filing 18
Order Vacating #17 Order to Show Cause as to Kelly Services, Inc.. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER Directing Defendant Kelly Services, Inc. to Show Cause for Local Rule 83.20(f). Show Cause Response due by 3/3/2023. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
Filing 16
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Shaina Wolfe appearing on behalf of Kelly Services, Inc. (Wolfe, Shaina)
|
|
Filing 15
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Kelly Services, Inc. (Maatman, Gerald)
|
|
Filing 14
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Kelly Services, Inc.. (Maatman, Gerald)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda M. Fielder on behalf of The Dow Chemical Company. (Fielder, Amanda)
|
|
Filing 12
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by The Dow Chemical Company (Bardelli, Edward)
|
|
Filing 11
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand (Reliance Upon) by The Dow Chemical Company. (Bardelli, Edward)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Edward J. Bardelli on behalf of The Dow Chemical Company. (Bardelli, Edward)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER Granting Defendant Kelly Service's Motion to Extend Response Deadline re #1 Complaint. (Response due by 2/14/2023. ) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, (AGREED) by Kelly Services, Inc.. (Maatman, Gerald)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr on behalf of Kelly Services, Inc.. (Maatman, Gerald)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph A. Ciucci on behalf of Kelly Services, Inc.. (Ciucci, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. The Dow Chemical Company served on 1/9/2023, answer due 1/30/2023. (Stempien, Eric)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Kelly Services, Inc. served on 1/9/2023, answer due 1/30/2023. (Stempien, Eric)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Issued for *Kelly Services, Inc.* (SSch)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued for *The Dow Chemical Company* (SSch)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Melodi Darling against Kelly Services, Inc., The Dow Chemical Company with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9172327 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Midland - County Where Action Arose: Midland - County of 1st Defendant: Midland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Stempien, Eric)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SSch)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
