Maceri v. Green Dot Bank et al
Plaintiff: Paul Maceri
Defendant: Green Dot Bank and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Case Number: 1:2023cv10701
Filed: March 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Thomas L Ludington
Referring Judge: Patricia T Morris
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 9/18/2023, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 10/27/2023 Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris. (Refer to image for additional dates) (KCas)
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Referring Matters for Full Pretrial to Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
April 5, 2023 Filing 6 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Green Dot Bank identifying Corporate Parent Green Dot Corporation, Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc. for Green Dot Bank. (Mihelick, John)
April 3, 2023 Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Cross, Matthew)
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER to Submit Material for Case Management Order. (Short Statements Submitted to Utilities; Proposed Orders by 4/19/2023. ) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
March 30, 2023 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand (First Amended Complaint) by Green Dot Bank. (Mihelick, John)
March 28, 2023 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses (First Amended Complaint) by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Cross, Matthew)
March 27, 2023 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra)
March 24, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Green Dot Bank from 88th District Court, case number 22-0168-GC. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9288076 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -Lower Court Docket Entries, #2 Exhibit 2- Lower Court Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit 3- Consent) (Mihelick, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maceri v. Green Dot Bank et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Maceri
Represented By: Ian Bryce Lyngklip
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Green Dot Bank
Represented By: John T. Mihelick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Represented By: Matthew W. Cross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?