Wood v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
Kristie Wood |
Uber Technologies Inc., Raiser, LLC and John Doe |
1:2023cv11991 |
August 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Thomas L Ludington |
Patricia T Morris |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint,, Extending Time to Respond to October 23, 2023 by Raiser, LLC, Uber Technologies Inc. (Berard, Matthew) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew G. Berard on behalf of Raiser, LLC, Uber Technologies Inc.. (Berard, Matthew) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Uber Technologies Inc.* (NAhm) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Raiser, LLC* (NAhm) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: BMIEDC-9449017 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Gladwin - County Where Action Arose: Gladwin - County of 1st Defendant: San Francisco. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Peacock, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.