Parker v. Dow Chemical Company
Plaintiff: Jermaine Parker
Defendant: The Dow Chemical Company and Dow Chemical Company
Case Number: 1:2023cv12428
Filed: September 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly G Altman
Referring Judge: Thomas L Ludington
2 Judge: Patricia T Morris
3 Judge: Stephen J Murphy
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's #5 Application to Excuse Local Rule 83.20(f) and Appear Without Local Counsel. (Vacating #4 Order to Show Cause.) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
October 9, 2023 Filing 5 [DOCUMENT TITLED: PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION PER LR 83.20(f)(1) FOR COUNSEL TO APPEAR WITHOUT LOCAL COUNSEL] RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Jermaine Parker. (Dubow, Daniel) Modified on 10/10/2023 (LGra).
September 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause Why Local Rule 83.20(f) Should not be Enforced. Show Cause Response due by 10/11/2023. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
September 28, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *The Dow Chemical Company* (MCho)
September 28, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Corrected Judicial Assignment due to Clerical Error: Reassigned from * District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III* and *Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman* in Detroit to District Judge Thomas L. Ludington and Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris in Bay City (SSch)
September 28, 2023 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (MCho)
September 25, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jermaine Parker against The Dow Chemical Company with Jury Demand. Fee waiver included in accordance with 28 USC 1916. Plaintiff requests summons issued. County of 1st Plaintiff: Midland County - County Where Action Arose: Oscoda County - County of 1st Defendant: Oscoda County. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Right To Sue) (Dubow, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker v. Dow Chemical Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jermaine Parker
Represented By: Daniel Dubow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Dow Chemical Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dow Chemical Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?