Krompetz v. Walmart, Inc.
| Karen Krompetz |
| Walmart, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv12915 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Patricia T Morris |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 8/23/2024; Settlement Conference set for 8/28/2024 at 2:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington; Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 9/23/2024; Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/4/2025 at 2:00 PM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington; Jury Trial set for 2/25/2025 at 8:30 AM before District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Refer to image for additional dates) (KWin)
|
| Filing 8 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Wright, Nicole) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John Clarence Cusmano on behalf of Walmart, Inc.. (Cusmano, John) |
| Filing 6 Exhibit List by Karen Krompetz. (Elkin, David) |
| Filing 5 PRELIMINARY WITNESS LIST by Karen Krompetz (Elkin, David) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER to Submit Material for Case Management Order. (Short Statements Submitted to CM/ECF;Utilities;Proposed Orders by 1/5/2024.) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
|
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Walmart, Inc. (Wright, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand Reliance by Walmart, Inc.. (Wright, Nicole) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart, Inc. from Saginaw County Circuit Court, case number 23-002192-NO. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9562825 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Complaint and Jury Demand, #3 Exhibit B - Service of Process Transmittal, #4 Exhibit C - Letter to Plaintiff's Attorney with proposed Stipulated Order Capping Damages, #5 Exhibit D - Email from Plaintiff's Attorney dated 11/03/23) (Wright, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Krompetz v. Walmart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karen Krompetz | |
| Represented By: | David J. Elkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Nicole M. Wright |
| Represented By: | John Clarence Cusmano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
