Wilson v. Arrowood et al
Plaintiff: Michael Wilson
Defendant: Paul Arrowood and Logan Barber
Case Number: 1:2024cv11151
Filed: April 30, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly G Altman
Referring Judge: Thomas L Ludington
2 Judge: Brandy R McMillion
3 Judge: Patricia T Morris
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mikayla Hamilton on behalf of Paul Arrowood. (Hamilton, Mikayla)
June 24, 2024 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Michael Wilson served on 6/23/2024, answer due 7/15/2024. (Papaioannou, Aristidi) Modified on 6/24/2024 (JPar). [Summons Returned Executed as to Paul Arrowood]
June 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER for Plaintiff(s) to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not be Dismissed as to Defendant Logan Barber for Failure to Prosecute. Show Cause Response due by 7/8/2024. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
May 23, 2024 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Logan Barber served on 5/12/2024, answer due 6/3/2024. (Papaioannou, Aristidi)
May 2, 2024 Filing 4 Notice of Corrected Judicial Assignment due to Clerical Error: Reassigned from * District Judge Brandy R. McMillion* and *Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman* in Detroit to District Judge Thomas L. Ludington and Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris in Bay City (SSch)
May 2, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Paul Arrowood, Logan Barber * (JPar)
May 2, 2024 Filing 2 [STRICKEN - DOCKETING ERROR] SUMMONS Issued for *Paul Arrowood, Logan Barber * (JPar) Modified on 5/2/2024 (JPar).
May 2, 2024 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (JPar)
April 30, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9772925 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: saginaw - County Where Action Arose: Saginaw - County of 1st Defendant: saignaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Papaioannou, Aristidi)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. Arrowood et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Wilson
Represented By: Aristidi Demetrios Papaioannou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Arrowood
Represented By: Mikayla Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Logan Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?