Muhammad v. Close
Plaintiff: Shakur Muhammad
Defendant: Mark Close
Case Number: 2:1998cv10153
Filed: June 2, 1998
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Ionia
Presiding Judge: Charles E. Binder
Presiding Judge: David M. Lawson
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER denying 180 Motion for New Trial. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof)
July 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 161 ORDER Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Setting Scheduling Conference; ( Scheduling Conference set for 8/1/2011 @ 11:30 AM before District Judge David M. Lawson)- Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muhammad v. Close
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shakur Muhammad
Represented By: Thomas W. Cranmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Close
Represented By: Kevin R. Himebaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?