Eastown, Incorporated et al v. Deeper Life Christian Church, Incorporated et al
Eastown, Incorporated and Dietrich Trust |
Deeper Life Christian Church, Incorporated, Deeper Life Christian Ministries and A. B. Jefferson |
2:2004cv72977 |
August 5, 2004 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Wayne |
Robert H Cleland |
Donald A Scheer |
Foreclosure |
No cause code entered |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 137 ORDER denying 131 , 132 Motion Seeking Relief from Order. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 129 ORDER DENYING 121 Objections to Garnishment, filed by A. B. Jefferson, Deeper Life Christian Ministries, Deeper Life Christian Church, Incorporated. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 101 ORDER granting 47 Motion to Substitute Party. Basil T Simon added. Dietrich Trust and Eastown, Incorporated terminated. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 22 RENEWED ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER granting 17 Motion for Order to Renew Civil Judgment. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting 11 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defendant Jefferson to answer post judgment interrogatories. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.