McCoy v. State of Michigan et al
| 2:2006cv10837 |
| February 24, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Unassigned |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 103 Motion in Limine; denying 104 Motion in Limine; denying 107 Motion to Quash; denying 109 Motion to Adjourn. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying 101 Motion for FRCP 54(b) Certificate for Appeal. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 94 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER AND OPINION re dispositive motions, order dismissing individual defendants and notice of status conference date. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying 44 Letter 45 Motion for Reconsideration; and 38 Application for Appointment of Counsel filed by Freddie McCoy,. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (DEld)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCoy v. State of Michigan et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
