Curry et al v. SBC Communications, Incorporated et al
| 2:2006cv11728 |
| April 10, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Unassigned |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
196
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 133 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claims of Percy Curry, Rick Banks II and Marie Hillard; FURTHER Ordered that those parts of Counts I, II and III of the amended complaint alleging disparate treatment and retaliation are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (PMil)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER striking 121 Motion for Summary Judgment; striking 122 Motion for Summary Judgment; striking 123 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part 126 Motion to Expedite; denying 129 Motion for leave to accept motions for summary judgment; denying 131 Motion to Sever. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (THal)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER Denying 108 Motion to Compel Complete Responses to Discovery Requests - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K Majzoub. (LBar)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Curry et al v. SBC Communications, Incorporated et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
