Lumsden v. Berguis
Petitioner: Alan Lumsden
Respondent: Mary Berguis
Case Number: 2:2007cv10140
Filed: January 9, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Alcona
Presiding Judge: Denise Page Hood
Presiding Judge: Mona K Majzoub
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPINION and ORDER denying 14 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 14 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (BLew)
October 29, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order Denying Habeas Relief and Denying Petitioner's Motion to Stay Proceedings Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JCre)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lumsden v. Berguis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mary Berguis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alan Lumsden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?