Fairlane Car Wash, Incorporated et al v. Knight Enterprises, Incorporated
| James Masouras, Fairlane Car Wash, Incorporated, PJJ Enterprises, L. L. C. and John Masouras |
| Knight Enterprises, Incorporated |
| Knight Enterprises, Incorporated |
| John Masouras, James Masouras, Fairlane Car Wash, Incorporated and PJJ Enterprises, L. L. C. |
| 2:2007cv10165 |
| January 9, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Steven D Pepe |
| Contract: Franchise |
| No cause code entered |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
OPINION AND ORDER denying 97 Attorney Mark Smiley's Motion for Attorney Fees to Enforce Lien against Judgment; denying 98 Motion for Appellate Attorney Fees; terminating as Moot 102 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER denying 91 Plaintiffs' Motion for Proceedings Against Surety. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
87
OPINION AND ORDER granting 80 Defendant's Motion for a Superseadeas Bond. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
59
OPINION AND ORDER denying 45 Defendant's Motion for Return of Property; denying 50 Defendant's Motion for New Trial, Order for Stay of Proceedings and Costs and Attorney Fees and granting 51 Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
