Franklin v. Birkette
Petitioner: Daniel Franklin
Respondent: Thomas Birkette
Case Number: 2:2007cv10548
Filed: February 6, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Arenac
Presiding Judge: Charles E Binder
Presiding Judge: David M Lawson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER denying 26 Motion to Hold Petition in Abeyance. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof)
June 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 AMENDED 25 Order on Motion for Leave to File and to Seal and Sealing 20 Notice of Filing Rule 5 Materials filed by Cindi Curtin. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franklin v. Birkette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas Birkette
Represented By: Brad H. Beaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?