Pucci v. Dearborn, City of et al
Julie A. Pucci |
Nineteenth District Court and Mark W. Somers |
2:2007cv10631 |
February 12, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Wayne |
David M Lawson |
Mona K Majzoub |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
No cause code entered |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 256 ORDER Granting 252 Motion to Renew Judgment. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 120 OPINION and ORDER Denying 107 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Stay and Remittitur and Brief in Support, Granting in part 110 MOTION for Attorney Fees Supplemental Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof) |
Filing 118 ORDER Granting 105 MOTION for Relief from 104 Judgment with Brief in Support filed by Mark W. Somers, and Temporarily Vacating 104 Judgment. Motions terminated: 105 MOTION for Relief from 104 Judgment with Brief in Support filed by Mark W. Somers. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof) |
Filing 96 ORDER denying 95 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof) |
Filing 63 ORDER Denying 62 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (JCre) |
Filing 61 Opinion and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions, Denying Defendants' Motion to Strike First Motion for Sanctions, and Dismissing Defendants' Third Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (JCre) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.