Dura Global Technologies, Incorporated et al v. Magna Donnelly Corporation
Plaintiff: Dura Operating Corporation and Dura Global Technologies, Incorporated
Defendant: Magna Donnelly Corporation
Case Number: 2:2007cv10945
Filed: March 5, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Sean F Cox
Presiding Judge: Mona K Majzoub
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 539 OPINION AND ORDER granting 452 Sealed Motion to Add Defendants and Change Caption. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
September 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 538 OPINION AND ORDER denying 511 Sealed Motion to Strike Dura's Proposed Final Pretrial Order. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
October 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 438 OPINION AND ORDER Construing Disputed Claim Terms Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
September 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 436 OPINION AND ORDER re OVERRULING 323 Objection filed by Dura Global Technologies, Incorporated, Dura Operating Corporation. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
April 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 405 OPINION AND ORDER denying 352 Motion for Reconsideration of Opinion and Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 349 OPINION AND ORDER denying 200 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 238 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
September 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 347 OPINION AND ORDER denying 201 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
September 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 346 OPINION AND ORDER denying 199 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
September 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 345 OPINION AND ORDER denying 175 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Counts X and XI. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
October 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 322 ORDER re 295 Sealed Document - Denying Request for Clarification or Alternatively for Reconsideration - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K Majzoub. (LBar)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dura Global Technologies, Incorporated et al v. Magna Donnelly Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dura Operating Corporation
Represented By: Peter D. McDermott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dura Global Technologies, Incorporated
Represented By: Peter D. McDermott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Magna Donnelly Corporation
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Sadowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?