Oliver v. Wolfenbarger et al
| Joey Oliver |
| Lewis, Klimowicz, Correction Medical Services, Carolynn DuBuc, Hugh Wolfenbarger, Larry Nunnery, J. Scott and John Doe |
| 2:2007cv12672 |
| June 25, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Jackson |
| Marianne O Battani |
| Virginia M Morgan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER Adopting 78 Report and Recommendation, 72 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Joe Scott, Larry Nunnery, Hugh Wolfenbarger Signed by District Judge Marianne O Battani. (BThe)
|
|
Filing
78
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to Grant 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support and Certificate of Service filed by Joe Scott, Larry Nunnery, Hugh Wolfenbarger - Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia M Morgan. (JJoh)
|
|
Filing
60
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER Adopting 49 Report and Recommendation, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, dismisses claims against Wolfenbarger, Nunnery, Scott and Klimowicz in their official capacities and dismisse s retaliation claims against Wolfenbarger, Scott, Lewis and Klimowicz and dismissing plaintiffs' request to transfer as moot and allowing plaintiff to file an amended complaint on or before November 7, 2008. Signed by District Judge Marianne O Battani. (ATee)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
