Franklin Bank v. Tindall et al
Franklin Bank |
Cadieux Corporation, Incorporated, Michael Edward Tindall, Tindall and Company, PC, Michigan Catholic Credit Union, Member First Mortgage, LLC and United States of America |
2:2007cv13748 |
September 6, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Wayne |
Patrick J Duggan |
Virginia M Morgan |
Contract: Other |
No cause code entered |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 210 JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff against Tindall. Judgment in the amount of $ 501,266.63. Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre) |
Filing 206 OPINION REGARDING BENCH TRIAL Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre) |
Filing 197 OPINION and ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGE CLAIM FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS & AWARDING DAMAGES TO PLAINTIFF, Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre) |
Filing 196 ORDER ESTABLISHING TRIAL DOCKET. Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre) |
Filing 184 OPINION AND ORDER denying 108 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 138 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre) |
Filing 183 OPINION and ORDER re 164 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision, 163 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision, Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre) |
Filing 178 ORDER ESTABLISHING TRIAL DOCKET. Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.