Cobbs v. Pramstaller et al
Plaintiff: Dallas Cobbs
Defendant: George J Pramstaller and John Doe
Case Number: 2:2007cv14644
Filed: October 30, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Charles E Binder
Presiding Judge: Anna Diggs Taylor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 110 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles E Binder. (JBro)
July 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART Magistrate Judge Charles Binder's 115 Report And Recommendation: GRANTING 103 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Craig Hutchinson, Bency Mathai and DENYING 103 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Correctional Medical Services, Inc.; DENYING 104 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Bonita Davis Neighbors, Haresh Pandya, George J Pramstaller, Gregory Naylor, Marcella Clark; DENYING 108 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Dallas Cobbs; Craig Hutchinson and Bency Mathai terminated. Signed by District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. (JCur)
September 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER Adopting 94 Report and Recommendation denying, 86 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Craig Hutchinson, Bency Mathai. Signed by District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. (JCur)
July 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 94 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending denying 86 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to 42 USC 1997e(a) and FRCP 12(b)(6)filed by Craig Hutchinson, Bency Mathai. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles E Binder. (PMor)
February 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER Adopting 77 Report and Recommendation that 66 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Haresh Pandya, George J Pramstaller, Gregory Naylor, Bonita Davis Neighbors, Marcella Clark, be GRANTED as to request for injunctive relief; DENIED in all other respects. 77 Signed by District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. (JCur)
December 5, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 77 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION That 66 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Haresh Pandya, George J Pramstaller, Gregory Naylor, Bonita Davis Neighbors, Marcella Clark be GRANTED as to request for injunctive relief; DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles E Binder. (JBro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cobbs v. Pramstaller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George J Pramstaller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dallas Cobbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?