Sloan v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation et al
John W Sloan |
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation and Michigan CAT |
2:2007cv14836 |
November 9, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Macomb |
Paul J Komives |
Lawrence P Zatkoff |
Contract: Other |
No cause code entered |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT from Macomb County Circuit Court that Court Received Remand Documents. (JCre) |
Filing 6 NOTICE remanding case to *MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT*. (DEld) |
Filing 5 ORDER REMANDING CASE to Macomb County Circuit Court. Signed by Honorable Lawrence P Zatkoff. (DEld) |
Filing 4 RESPONSE to #2 MOTION to Remand and Certificate of Service filed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits#2 Exhibit 1 - Security Agreement#3 Exhibit 2 - Lease Agreement#4 Exhibit 3 - Corporate Entity Details of Caterpillar) (Dolan, John) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF FAILURE TO COMPLY with Local Rule 5.1.1 issued to attorney Charles J. Moceri re #2 MOTION to Remand (AGre) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Notice of Filing of Removal and MOTION to Remand by John W Sloan. (AGre) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from Macomb County Circuit Court, case number 07-4344-CZ. Receipt No: 563987 - Fee: $ 350 (AGre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.