RDI of Michigan, LLC v. Michigan Coin-Op Vending, Incorporated et al
| RDI of Michigan, LLC |
| Does, Michigan Coin-Op Vending, Incorporated, Jordan Mirch and Roes |
| 2:2008cv11177 |
| March 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Oakland |
| Majzoub |
| Zatkoff |
| Copyright |
| No cause code entered |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER denying 88 Sealed Motion; denying 89 Sealed Motion. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER denying 74 Motion to Set Aside. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)
|
|
Filing
70
[STRICKEN] OPINION and ORDER. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. (CGre) Modified on 3/11/2010 (BSoc).
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. (MVer)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. (MVer)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 39 Motion for Leave to File; granting 42 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Neil S. Rockind terminated; granting 43 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 9 Motion for Order. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (MVer)
|
|
Filing
53
OPINION and ORDER granting 31 MOTION to strike polygraph report and exclude polygraph evidence and granting 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. (DTyl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
