Prescott v. Bell
Petitioner: Robert Prescott
Respondent: Thomas Bell
Case Number: 2:2008cv11861
Filed: October 21, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
Presiding Judge: Mona K Majzoub
Presiding Judge: Arthur J Tarnow
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: No cause code entered

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Transferring Case to USCA for the Sixth Circuit signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (Grimes, K.)
October 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Denying PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Signed by District Judge Arthur J Tarnow. (TTay)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prescott v. Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Prescott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas Bell
Represented By: Laura A. Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?