Webb v. Wolfenbarger
Charles Webb |
Hugh Wolfenbarger |
2:2008cv12692 |
June 23, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Macomb |
Scheer |
Steeh |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
No cause code entered |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 OPINION AND ORDER denying 14 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 12 OPINION and ORDER Dismissing with prejudice 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Denying a Certificate of Appealability and Denying Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (NHol) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Webb v. Wolfenbarger | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Charles Webb | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Hugh Wolfenbarger | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.