Bowen v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
| David Bowen |
| Michigan Department of Corrections and Allen |
| 2:2008cv12877 |
| July 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Chippewa |
| Cohn |
| Pepe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 43 Report and Recommendation, granting 39 Motion for Summary Judgment,, filed by Allen Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (PPau)
|
|
Filing
43
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on Lack of Exhaustion, Sovereign Immunity, Absence of Genuine Issue and Qualified Immunity filed by Allen Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (BRad)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. Granting in Part 11 Motion to Dismiss filed by Patricia Caruso Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (LHac)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 11 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b), Brief in Support, with Certificate of Service filed by Patricia Caruso Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven D Pepe. (VSim)
|
|
Filing
16
AMENDED ORDER re 14 Letter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven D Pepe. (VSim)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING IN PART 14 re: Motion to Amend Complaint and Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven D Pepe. (VSim)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
