Teel v. Palmer
Petitioner: Antoine Teel
Respondent: Carmen Palmer
Case Number: 2:2008cv13172
Filed: July 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Ionia
Presiding Judge: Battani
Presiding Judge: Pepe
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPINION AND ORDER Denying re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Antoine Teel and Granting in part a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (BThe)
April 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying 11 Motion for Bond. Signed by District Judge Marianne O Battani. (BThe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Teel v. Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Carmen Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antoine Teel
Represented By: Elizabeth L. Jacobs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?