Clements v. Howes
Petitioner: Odrecus Clements
Respondent: Carol Howes
Case Number: 2:2008cv14270
Filed: October 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Branch
Presiding Judge: Borman
Presiding Judge: Scheer
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 OPINION and ORDER DENYING re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, declining to issue a certificate of appealability and denying application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo)
September 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting 14 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clements v. Howes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Odrecus Clements
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Carol Howes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?