Kaplan v. Experian Information Solutions, Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Darryl B Kaplan
Defendant: Equifax, Incorporated, Experian Information Solutions, Incorporated and Trans Union, LLC
Case Number: 2:2009cv10047
Filed: January 7, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Cox
Presiding Judge: Morgan
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 107 JUDGMENT Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (BSoc)
May 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 93 AMENDED OPINION ORDER re 68 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Experian filed by Darryl B Kaplan, 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Statement of Undisputed Facts filed by Experian, Incorporated. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
April 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER granting re 84 Emergency MOTION for Reconsideration re 83 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Darryl B Kaplan Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
April 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 83 OPINION AND ORDER denying 68 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 31 Defendant Experian's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
January 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER striking 67 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 70 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
December 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OPINION AND ORDER Striking 32 Motion for Summary Judgment and 37 Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Without Prejudice 42 Motion to Dismiss for Plaintiff's Contumacious and Dilatory Failure; Denying 47 Motion to Amend Complaint; Denying 48 Motion to Extend Discovery ; Denying as Moot 50 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
October 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER granting 43 Motion to Stay Briefing and Consideration on 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment Establishing Liability Against Defendant, Trans Union, Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P Rule 56(d)(2) by Darryl B Kaplan. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaplan v. Experian Information Solutions, Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Incorporated
Represented By: Tamara Fraser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trans Union, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darryl B Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?