Baker v. Bannum Place of Saginaw, et al
| Darryl Baker |
| Frierson, Mark A Cuneen, Vertrice Roby, Lyons, Bannum Place of Saginaw, LaToya Burnside, Dorothy Jones, Clairinet McFadden, Jody Bradely and Henry Hobson |
| 2:2009cv10360 |
| January 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Saginaw |
| Edmunds |
| Scheer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER granting 88 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CHem)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER denying 79 Motion For Marshals to Serve Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (Miles, M)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying 39 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 44 Report and Recommendation ; denying 33 Motion for Judgment. Signed by District Judge Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem)
|
|
Filing
44
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 33 MOTION for Judgment filed by Darryl Baker and 39 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Clairinet McFadden, Dorothy Jones, Henry Hobson, Bannum Place of Saginaw, Lyons, Vertrice Roby, Frierson, LaToya Burnside. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (Miles, M)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION and ORDER Regarding 5 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (KGri)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
