Hoxie v. Livingston,County of et al
Gregory J Hoxie |
Cheryl Miks, Matthew Young, Livingston, County of, Robert Bezotte, Michael J. Murphy, Thomas Cremonte and Matthew Hoffman |
2:2009cv10725 |
February 26, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Grand Traverse |
Majzoub |
Steeh |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 203 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea) |
Filing 195 ORDER granting 162 defendant Simpson's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 166 Livington County defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 182 plaintiff's Motion for Contempt and Default. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 171 ORDER granting 165 Livingston County Defendants' Motion to Extend to file motion for summary judgment and denying 167 plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 158 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 157 Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoena - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K Majzoub. (LBar) |
Filing 156 ORDER granting in part 154 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 151 ORDER Resolving Livingston County Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration 140 and Defendant Simpson's 142 and Livingston County Defendants' Motions to Extend Discovery 147 . Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 146 ORDER granting in part 143 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification (re 136 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion for Judgment). Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 136 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Sheryl Simpson, D.O.'s Motion to Dismiss 38 and granting in part and denying in part Defendants Livingston County, Sheriff Bezotte, Undersheriff Murphy and Jail Administration Lieutenant Cremonte, Corrections Officers Otten, Howe, Cortez, York, Boyer, Jackson, Davis and Barry's Renewed Motion for Judgment on the pleadings 49 . Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 135 ORDER Overruling Livingston County Defendants' Objections 126 127 and granting Plaintiff's Objections 132 . Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 124 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 72 Motion to Compel - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K Majzoub. (LBar) |
Filing 78 ORDER denying 54 Motion for Protective Order - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K Majzoub. (LBar) |
Filing 68 ORDER Overruling Livingston County Defendants' Objections 61 to Magistrate Judge's 12/22/09 Order 57 Granting in Part Plaintiff's First Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 57 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Compel Discovery - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K Majzoub. (LBar) |
Filing 36 ORDER granting Defendant Simpson's Motion to Set Aside Default 33 . Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting 8 defendants' Motion for Judgment on the pleadings, dismissing plaintiff's state law claims with prejudice, dismissing plaintiff's federal claims without prejudice, and granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint on or before 7/31/09. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.