Lewis et al v. Drouillard et al
| Janet Conforto, Angela Jones, Michael Belleville, Roberta Carevic, Daniel DiDonato, Sammy Lewis, John Miller, Shawne Henry, Christine Singleton and Daniel Honoway |
| United Parcel Service, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Paul Drouillard |
| 2:2009cv11059 |
| March 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Cleland |
| Hluchaniuk |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 56 Motion to Dismiss; granting 59 Motion to Dismiss; granting 66 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 50 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 51 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 53 Motion to Strike; denying 54 Motion for Leave to File; Amends Order of 3/22/2010. Signed by District Judge Victoria A Roberts. (CPin)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 32 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 45 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Victoria A Roberts. (CPin)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting in part 18 Motion to Stay; granting in part 23 Motion to Stay; STAYING case pending resolution of Brown v Cassens Transp Co and setting deadline for Defendant Drouillard to file a motion under Rule 12(b(6) by 7/20/2009 [See order for details]. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
