Wilson v. Rapelje et al
| Harold Lee Wilson, II |
| John Turner, Jane Hawkin, O. T. Wynn, Susan McCulley, Scott Freed, Lloyd Rapelje, Val Chaplin and R. Nelson |
| 2:2009cv13030 |
| July 31, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Cohn |
| Randon |
| Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER Adopting 37 Report and Recommendation and Granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing Case. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (CGre)
|
|
Filing
37
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment Under Rule 56(B), Brief in Support, Index of Exhibits, Exhibits A through E, with Certificate of Service MOTION for Summary Judgment Under Rule 56(B), Brief in Support, Index of Exhibits, Exhibits A through E, with Certificate of Service MOTION for Summary Judgment Under Rule 56(B), Brief in Support, Index of Exhibits, Exhibits A through E, with Certificate of Service filed by R. Nelson, Jane Hawkin, Susan McCulley, Scott Freed, John Turner, Val Chaplin, Lloyd Rapelje Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (Miles, M)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Michigan (and partial dismissal); signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb) [Transferred from miwd on 7/31/2009.] Modified on 7/31/2009 (SSro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
