Methode Electronics, Inc. v. Delphi Automotive Systems LLC et al
| Methode Electronics, Inc. |
| Delphi Automotive Systems LLC and Marian, Incorporated |
| Delphi Automotive Systems LLC and Delphi Technologies, Inc. |
| Methode Electronics, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv13078 |
| August 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Borman |
| Morgan |
| Other |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
206
OPINION and ORDER GRANTING re (136 in 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-MKM, 176 in 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-MKM) MOTION to Strike Statement of Opposition to the Objection of Methode Electronics, Inc. to the Response by the Special Master to the Objections of the Partie s filed by Methode Electronics, Inc., ADOPTS AND MODIFIES IN PART, (119 in 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-MKM, 79 in 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-MKM) Report of Special Master filed by Jay G Taylor, GRANTS (84 in 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-MKM, 124 in 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-MKM) MOTI ON to Strike the Declaration of Charles A. Garris, Jr., Dkt. 121-3 filed by Delphi Automotive Systems LLC, Delphi Technologies, Inc., Marian, Incorporated. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. Associated Cases: 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-MKM, 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-MKM (DGoo)
|
|
Filing
186
OPINION ORDER denying (170) Motion to Stay; dismissing (171) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-MKM; denying (130) Motion to Stay; dismissing (131) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-MKM and cancelling 3/15/2012 hearing.. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. Associated Cases: 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-MKM, 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-MKM (DGoo)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER Requesting Special Master Jay G. Taylor to Respond on or before 1/31/2012 to the Parties' Objections re (79 in 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-MKM) to the Report of Special Master; Responses due within 14 days to the response to the objections filed by Jay G Taylor. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. Associated Cases: 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-MKM, 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-MKM (LWag)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER granting in part and denying in part (103) Motion to Compel in case 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-MKM; granting in part and denying in part (63) Motion to Compel in case 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-MKM - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. Associated Cases: 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-MKM, 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-MKM (LBar)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER ADJOURNING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 17, 2011 and proposing appointment of a Special Master. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. Associated Cases: 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-VMM, 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-VMM (DGoo)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER to Strike (29 in 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-VMM) Memorandum Opinion & Order,. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. Associated Cases: 2:09-cv-13078-PDB-VMM, 2:09-cv-14303-PDB-VMM (DGoo)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER setting aside re 47 Protective Order. THE COURT WILL HOLD A HEARING ON JANUARY 8, 2010 AT 3 PM ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.S TIMELY-FILED OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MORGANS NOVEMBER 17, 2009 OPINION AND ORDER Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part 31 Motion for Protective Order and denying 30 Motion for Protective Order - Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia M Morgan. (JJoh)
|
|
Filing
2
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable David H. Coar on 7/16/2009:(mb, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 8/5/2009.] Modified on 8/5/2009 (SSro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
