Ciaramitaro v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
Plaintiff: Tammy Ciaramitaro
Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Greektown Casino, LLC
Case Number: 2:2009cv13492
Filed: September 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Steeh
Presiding Judge: Whalen
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER on Remand awarding attorney fees. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea)
June 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER granting plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees in part 51 , granting plaintiff's Rule 59(E) Motion 52 , denying plaintiff's Rule 60(B) Motion 54 and remanding matter to claims administrator for recalculation of benefits determination. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea)
February 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER denying plaintiff's request 42 (MOTION) to Compel Recalculation of LTD Benefits and denying plaintiff's request for civil penalities, pre-judgment interest, punitive damages and attorney fees. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea)
July 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 plaintiff's Motion to Compel defendant to recalculate long-term disability benefit offsets and retroactive payout, request for interest, attorney's feed and civil penalties. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea)
November 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER denying plaintiff's Motion to Compel 34 and granting plaintiff's motion to clarify production of administrative record and allow submission of previous medical records not part of current administrative record 35 . Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
June 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER Enjoining Plaintiff from phoning or physically appearing at counsel for defendant UNUM Life Insurance's Law Firm. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
November 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting 8 Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ciaramitaro v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Represented By: K. Scott Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greektown Casino, LLC
Represented By: Peter W. Peacock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Ciaramitaro
Represented By: Cecil D. St. Pierre, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?