Congregation Shema Yis-Rael et al v. Pontiac, City of
| Congregation Shema Yis-Rael, Loren Jacobs and Martha Jacobs |
| Pontiac, City of |
| 2:2009cv13718 |
| September 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Oakland |
| Hood |
| Morgan |
| Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER denying 92 Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from Judgment and Clarifying the March 30, 2012 89 Order. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER Granting in part 58 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Deeming as Moot 65 Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief Under Rule 56(f). Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs' motion for leave to file first amended complaint 38 and deeming defendant City of Pontiac's motion to strike the order granting joint motion for entry of scheduling order moot 45 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting defendant's motion for partial summary judgment 13 , deeming plaintiffs' motion under Rule 56(f) 14 moot and scheduling a Final Pre-Trial Conference, ( Joint Final Pretrial Order due by 5/31/2011 and Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/6/2011 02:00 PM before District Judge Denise Page Hood) Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
