Kaye v. Unum Group/Provident Life and Accident
Plaintiff: Charles J Kaye
Defendant: Unum Group/Provident Life and Accident
Case Number: 2:2009cv14873
Filed: December 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Cook
Presiding Judge: Morgan
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER denying 17 Motion for Judgment; granting 25 Motion ; granting 25 Motion for Judgment. Signed by District Judge Julian Abele Cook. (KDoa)
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss COUNT II. Signed by District Judge Julian Abele Cook. (KDoa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaye v. Unum Group/Provident Life and Accident
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unum Group/Provident Life and Accident
Represented By: K. Scott Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles J Kaye
Represented By: Gregory J. Stempien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?