Wyatt et al v. WAMU/JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
James C Wyatt, II and Laydell Wyatt |
WAMU/JP Morgan Chase Bank, Pathway Financial, LLC and Trott and Trott PC |
2:2009cv14919 |
December 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Washtenaw |
Lawson |
Hluchaniuk |
Other |
No cause code entered |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 136 ORDER Adopting 135 Report and Recommendation, and Granting 116 Motion to Dismiss filed by Trott and Trott PC. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof) |
Filing 133 ORDER denying 126 Motion to Set Aside. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof) |
Filing 123 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 111 Motion to Dismiss,, filed by WAMU/JP Morgan Chase Bank, 118 Report and Recommendation, WAMU/JP Morgan Chase Bank terminated. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof) |
Filing 107 ORDER Adopting In Part Magistrate Judge's 100 Report and Recommendation, Overruling Plaintiffs' 102 Objections to Report and Recommendation, Sustaining Defendants' 101 Objections, Vacating 95 Default Judgment, Denying [28, 41] Motions to Dismiss, Granting Plaintiffs 80 Leave to Amend Complaint, and Continuing Order of Reference. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (CGre) |
Filing 90 ORDER overruling plaintiff's objections, adopting 75 Report and Recommendation and denying 19 and 21 Motions to strike. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DPer) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.