Compressor Engineering Corporation v. Chicken Shack, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Compressor Engineering Corporation
Defendant: Chicken Shack, Inc., Chicken Shack Depot, Inc. and Charles J. Thomas, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2010cv10059
Filed: January 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Borman
Presiding Judge: Morgan
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 130 OPINION AND ORDER granting 82 Motion to Certify Class; granting 92 Motion for Leave to File; denying 96 Motion for Leave to File; granting 99 Motion for Leave to File; granting 110 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
February 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER denying 111 Motion to Stay; granting in part and denying in part 116 Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Stay. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
February 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 108 OPINION AND ORDER denying 79 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER Denying 75 Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Certification of Order for Purposes of Interlocutory Appeal filed by Charles J. Thomas, Jr. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
September 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 104 OPINION AND ORDER denying 57 Motion to Reassign Case.. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
February 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendant's 67 Motion to Compel, Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (MWil)
January 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER re: 64 MOTION to Stay re: 62 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses from Plaintiff Compressor Engineering Corporation filed by Compressor Engineering Corporation., ( If Unresolved Issues remain, Plaintiff shall file response by 1/17/2014)(see Order for additional date), Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (MWil)
July 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Compressor Engineering Corporation v. Chicken Shack, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Compressor Engineering Corporation
Represented By: Jason J. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chicken Shack, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chicken Shack Depot, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles J. Thomas, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?