American Postal Workers Union, Detroit District Area Local, AFL-CIO v. United States Postal Service
Plaintiff: American Postal Workers Union, Detroit District Area Local, AFL-CIO
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Case Number: 2:2010cv10316
Filed: January 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Duggan
Presiding Judge: Komives
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying 5 Motion for TRO. Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: American Postal Workers Union, Detroit District Area Local, AFL-CIO v. United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American Postal Workers Union, Detroit District Area Local, AFL-CIO
Represented By: Christopher P. Legghio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?