P&M Corporate Finance, LLC v. Paparella
Plaintiff: P&M Corporate Finance, LLC
Defendant: Michael Paparella
Case Number: 2:2010cv10448
Filed: February 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Oakland
Presiding Judge: Hluchaniuk
Presiding Judge: Zatkoff
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER denying 12 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. (MVer)
September 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER denying 2 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P Zatkoff. (MVer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: P&M Corporate Finance, LLC v. Paparella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Paparella
Represented By: Paul E. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: P&M Corporate Finance, LLC
Represented By: Dominic A. Paluzzi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?