Pierce v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: John H Pierce
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Case Number: 2:2010cv10511
Filed: February 5, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Macomb
Presiding Judge: Cleland
Presiding Judge: Whalen
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 14 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (CGre)
October 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by John H Pierce, 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Social Security, Commissioner of Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (MLan)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pierce v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John H Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?