Army v. Detroit, City of et al
Plaintiff: Tyson Edward Army
Defendant: City of Detroit
Case Number: 2:2010cv11225
Filed: March 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Robert H Cleland
Presiding Judge: Mona K Majzoub
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff. (BSoc)
April 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER to Strike 20 Response to Motion filed by Tyson Edward Army, 21 Exhibit filed by Tyson Edward Army and directing plaintiff to re-file the response by 5:00 pm on 4/26/2011. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Army v. Detroit, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyson Edward Army
Represented By: Dan Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Detroit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?