Stanford v. Corbin et al
| Wayne Stanford |
| Keith E. Corbin, Frank G. Larson and Gary D. Cooley |
| 2:2010cv11689 |
| April 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| John Feikens |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Strike; denying 19 Motion for Sanctions; denying 19 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo)
|
|
Filing
50
OPINION and ORDER AFFIRMING re 39 Order on Motion to Disqualify Counsel. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 43 MOTION for Clarification of the January 10th Order re 42 Order filed by Gary D. Cooley, Frank G. Larson, Keith E. Corbin. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
|
|
Filing
42
AMENDED ORDER re 41 Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER STRIKING OBJECTIONS re 39 Order on Motion to Disqualify Counsel., ( Miscellaneous Hearing set for 2/2/2011 10:30 AM before District Judge Paul D Borman) Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying 16 Motion to Disqualify Counsel.. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (MLan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
