Tampone et al v. Richmond et al
Dominic Tampone, Merchant Assure LLC and International Commerce Solutions, Inc. |
Gregory Richmond, Andrew J. Broder, Merchant Assure Specialty Products, LLC, f/k/a RGS Consulting Merchant Assure Insurance Agency, LLC and Royal Group Services, LLC |
2:2010cv11776 |
April 30, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Oakland |
Patrick J Duggan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 OPINION AND ORDER denying 106 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 107 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Patrick J. Duggan. (MOre) |
Filing 103 OPINION AND ORDER granting 48 Motion in Limine; granting 49 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 80 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Patrick J. Duggan. (MOre) |
Filing 75 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion to Compel - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. (LBar) |
Filing 61 ORDER ESTABLISHING TRIAL DOCKET FOR MAY/JUNE, 2011. Signed by District Judge Patrick J. Duggan. (MOre) |
Filing 40 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre) |
Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER denying 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.