Toney v. Lafler
Bruce Toney |
Blaine Lafler |
2:2010cv12102 |
May 25, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Montcalm |
Robert H Cleland |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING 11 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal filed by Bruce Toney Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 5 OPINION and ORDER Dismissing Without Prejudice 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Denying Motion to Exceed Page Limit as Moot, and Denying a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (CGre) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Toney v. Lafler | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Bruce Toney | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Blaine Lafler | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.