Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund et al v. Municipal and Industrial Storage, Incorporated et al
Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund, Iron Workers Health Fund of Eastern Michigan, Iron Workers Local 25 Vacation Pay Fund and Iron Workers Apprenticeship Fund of Eastern Michigan |
Municipal and Industrial Storage, Incorporated and Al Lettinga |
2:2010cv12502 |
June 24, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Oakland |
Paul D Borman |
Mona K Majzoub |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 140 OPINION and ORDER denying in part 80 Motion to Amend/Correct JUDGMENT TO INCLUDE AUDIT AMOUNTS AND GRANTING PRIORITY IN ESCROWED FUNDS TO INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT CHEMICAL BANK. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo) |
Filing 79 ORDER Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 78 Report and Recommendation, Further Directing the Garnishees (and Plaintiffs to the Extent They Have Received Garnished Funds) to Remit Funds to the Clerk of the Court to be Held in an Interest-Bearing Escrow Account; and Ordering the Parties to Submit Briefs on the Issue of Priority of Interest in the Garnished Funds - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (FMos) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting 38 Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo) |
Filing 36 ORDER AND OPINION granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DGoo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.