Chrysler Group LLC v. Fox Hills Motor Sales, Incorporated, et al
| Chrysler Group LLC |
| Fox Hills Motor Sales, Inc. d/b/a Fox Hills Chrysler Jeep, Village Chrysler Jeep,Inc. d/b/a Village Automotive Center, Dick Scott, Inc. d/b/a Dick Scott Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, Suburban Troy LLC d/b/a Suburban Chrysler Jeep Dodge of Troy, Southfield Jeep, Inc. d/b/a Southfield Dodge Chrysler Jeep, McInerney, Inc. d/b/a Northland Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Crestwood Dodge, Inc. d/b/a Crestwood Dodge Chrysler Jeep |
| 2:2010cv12984 |
| July 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Sean F Cox |
| Paul J Komives |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
556
ORDER re 541 Emergency Motion Enforce Settlement Agreement. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
|
Filing
500
OPINION AND ORDER Following Bench Trial. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
|
Filing
471
ORDER denying 469 MOTION for Reconsideration re 467 Order on Motion filed by Fred Martin Motor Company. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
|
Filing
468
OPINION AND ORDER re 428 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Livonia Chrysler Jeep Inc., 429 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Chrysler Group LLC. (Final Pretrial Conference reset for 6/3/2013 02:30 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox, Bench Trial set for 7/9/2013 08:30 AM before District Judge Sean F. Cox) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
|
Filing
400
ORDER DENYING 362 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, DENYING 373 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) and Rule 54(b) filed by Boucher Imports, Inc. d/b/a Frank Boucher Chrysler, DENYING 370 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by Fox Hills Motor Sales Incorporated. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
|
|
Filing
361
OPINION AND ORDER denying 355 Motion for Oral Argument re Partial Summary Judgment; denying 360 Motion for Oral Arguement ; denying 193 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 210 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 215 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 219 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 220 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 225 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 228 Motion for Summar y Judgment; granting 229 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 231 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 234 Motion to Dismiss; denying 234 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 241 Motion for Summary Judgment; gra nting 242 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 243 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 244 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 247 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
|
|
Filing
316
ORDER denying 217 Motion to Dismiss; denying 217 Motion to Transfer Case. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
|
|
Filing
195
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 100 Motion to Dismiss; denying 111 Motion to Dismiss; denying 121 Motion to Dismiss; denying 156 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER Granting 129 Request for Extension of time for United States to file its Intervention Motion and Memorandum. Motion and Memorandum due by 3/28/2010. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
