Collins v. National General Insurance Company
| Naomi Collins |
| National General Insurance Company |
| 2:2010cv13344 |
| August 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Wayne |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Paul J Komives |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
AMENDED ORDER for Approval of Settlement and Authorizing Distribution of Funds. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER for Approval of Settlement and Authorizing Distribution of Proceeds. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule as to (Defendant's Motion for a Declaration of Setoff due by 11/28/2011; Plaintiff's Combined Response and Motion due by 12/12/2011, Defendant's Combined Response and Reply due by 12/27/2011; Plaintiff's Sur-Reply due by 1/10/2012) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
39
OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 34 Defendant's Motion for Contempt; denying 35 Defendant's Second Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION AND ORDER denying 28 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Requiring Response as to 28 MOTION rehearing re 26 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,:( Responses due by 8/17/2011) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER granting 13 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 22 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and directing parties to submit proposed judgment by 7/8/2011. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
20
AMENDED ORDER Requiring Response as to 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment :( Responses due by 2/25/2011, Replies due by 3/11/2011) Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Requiring Response as to 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment :( Responses due by 2/25/2011, Replies due by 3/11/2011) Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER SETTING Deadlines for Motions, (Motion to Stay to be filed by 11/19/2010; Responses due by 11/29/2010, Replies due by 12/3/2010) Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
|
|
Filing
10
OPINION AND ORDER denying 6 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Collins v. National General Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Naomi Collins | |
| Represented By: | Brian A. McKenna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National General Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Michael F. Schmidt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
